Skip to main content

Difference between parody and satire?

The words parody and satire are often used interchangeably but they are not synonymous.
1. Parody is typically aimed at a specific target

2.   Parody uses caricature

A parody exaggerates commonly recognisable traits or features. It creates a visual or verbal caricature that its audience should immediately recognise. An impressionist might do this by taking a real or imagined catch-phrase - the pound in your pocket was associated with British Prime Minister Harold Wilson, for example. A good parody requires accurate imitation of detail.

3.  Satire is more broadly ideological.

Satire assumes some intention or purpose - to make a political point or expose a perceived failing. Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels was aimed at various (long-forgotten) political targets but has endured because its broader themes are universal.

4. Parody can be a form of tribute

A parody implies public recognition - the audience needs to recognise the target for it to work. Many parodies are essentially affectionate and some have the collaboration of the target. George Harrison actively participated in the production of The Rutles. 

Comments

  1. Thanks for the clarification. I myself am confused between satire and parody. Now I know. So it's wrong to say satire when it's just for laughs.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Which countries do not have an official language?

According to Henry Hitchings Language Wars (2011) these nations do not currently have an official primary language:

Why is English not the official language of England?

58 countries list English as an official language - but not the UK. 

What is 'concept creep'?

Concept creep a term coined to describe 'psychology's expanding concepts of harm and pathology'. 
by applying concepts of abuse, bullying, and trauma to less severe and clearly defined actions and events, and by increasingly including subjective elements into them, concept creep may release a flood of unjustified accusations and litigation, as well as excessive and disproportionate enforcement regimes.   The concepts of abuse, bullying, trauma, mental disorder, addiction, and prejudice ... {have been subjected to historical changes}. In each case, the concept's boundary has stretched and its meaning has dilated. SourceThis trend towards a very broad definition of what constitutes 'harm' has been particularly pronounced on university campuses in the USA and - to a lesser extent - in the UK.



See Conor Friedersdorf's Atlantic essay, 'How Americans Became So Sensitive to Harm'

Download English FAQ Teaching Pack for only £1.99